Sunday, November 30, 2025

Sir Winston Churchill on the reality of public opinion

A satirical digital portrait of Winston Churchill reimagined in the twenty-first century, his legendary bulldog scowl trained not upon the enemy but a glowing smartphone. The artist renders him with remarkable fidelity: the bowler hat, polka-dotted bow tie, and omnipresent cigar—all hallmarks of Churchillian defiance—are intact, yet their gravitas is comically undercut by the incongruity of modern technology. Behind him, the Union Jack looms in vivid hues of red, white, and blue, emblematic of the indomitable British spirit he once personified. The light catches the creases of his brow and the curl of smoke from his cigar, giving the scene both humour and gravitas. The composition suggests an allegory of the digital age—an icon of steadfast conviction confronted by the triviality and distraction of the contemporary world, frowning as though the fate of civilisation itself depended upon what he sees on the screen.

“There is no such thing as public opinion. There is only published opinion,” stated Winston Churchill—a remark that lands with eerie foresight in the age of dictatorial algorithms and mass hysteria, wherein opinion is made a merchandised trade, and the mob a marketplace. One may well conceive the old war-dog beholding the endless scroll of social babble, and judging—after his wonted fashion and without the least strain of hyperbole—that our civilisation had clean parted company with its wits.

Born on 30 November 1874 amidst the rolling fields of West Oxfordshire, and sprung of an American mother of notable grace and an English father of noble blood yet scant forbearance, Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill embodied a species of Englishman now almost extinct. A lover of cigars, whisky, and the English language in equal measure, he stood as the living antithesis of his nemesis, the teetotal vegetarian tyrant across the Channel. Churchill’s vices were human; his virtues, monumental.

By any reckoning, the twentieth century’s most formidable statesman—a relic of another age even whilst he lived, and yet utterly needful to his own time. In an era that prized shallow cries above substance, he wielded words as others wield artillery; and when civilisation hung by a thread, it was his voice—gravelled, resolute, and adamant—that held the rampart fast.

In today’s absurd universe, one with many echoes of the atmosphere that led to the Second World War, Churchill’s spectre is more needed than ever. Yet I discern much of his iron resolve in Volodymyr Zelensky: a witness that greatness, however blemished, once walked amongst mortal men, and that valour, when once uttered aloud, may yet ring forth with truth.

Copyright 2025, Arthur Newhook.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Sun, stones, and smiles at the English seaside: Jean Kent, 29 June 1921 to 30 November 2013

Jean Kent —who departed this mortal stage upon this day in 2013, aged ninety—was one of the most English of stars: one whose brightness seld...