Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts

Saturday, July 25, 2026

Greta Granstedt: when every smile sold a dream


Swedish-American actress and model Greta Granstedt, 13 July 1907 to 7 October 1987. Never a headliner during Hollywood's Golden Age, yet possessed of a smile that still reaches across the decades. {photo: circa 1931–33, possibly by Eugene Robert Richee for Paramount Pictures}

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Friday, July 17, 2026

Remembering the great vaudevillian James Cagney, born 17 July 1899

A black-and-white publicity still from the 1931 Warner Bros. crime film The Public Enemy, featuring James Cagney and Jean Harlow. Cagney sits in the foreground wearing a tuxedo and bow tie, his expression stern and determined as he loosely grips a revolver resting across his lap. Behind him, Harlow stands elegantly in a satin evening gown with a flowing shoulder drape, holding a long cigarette holder while gazing coolly towards the camera. One hand rests lightly upon Cagney's shoulder, reinforcing their dramatic partnership. A small table with an ashtray, cigarettes, and an ice bucket completes the sophisticated Art Deco setting, emphasising Hollywood's glamorous yet dangerous vision of the Prohibition-era underworld.
Warner Brothers

“I still think of myself essentially as a vaudevillian, as a song and dance man. The vaudevillians I knew by and large were marvelous people. Ninety percent of them had no schooling, but they had a vivid something or other about them that absolutely riveted an audience's attention. Those vaudevillians knew something that ultimately I came to understand and believe - that audiences are the ones who determine material. They buy the tickets.” — the Hollywood god James Cagney, reflecting on his ‘schooling’ in the world of entertainment. (source: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000010/quotes/)

Seen here with the goddess Jean Harlow in a promotional shot for The Public Enemy (1931, WB).

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Tuesday, July 7, 2026

Virginia Rappe: the star she might have become

lack-and-white studio portrait of a young woman with dark, wavy bobbed hair, smiling and looking to the side. She wears a strapless, satin evening gown with a floral corsage at the waist, a dark ribbon belt, and a long fringed, patterned shawl draped over one shoulder and arm. She stands against a plain dark backdrop, one hand resting on her hip. The photograph bears a label reading 'RAPPE' and a negative number in the upper corners.
George Grantham Bain

Model and silent film actress Virginia Rappe: born 7 July 1891 and died under horrible circumstances, officially as a result of a ruptured bladder, 9 September 1921, four days after a Labor Day party in San Francisco, held in the hotel suite of one of the silver screen’s most famous and beloved actors of the day, Roscoe ‘Fatty’ Arbuckle. Arbuckle was tried three times on charges of rape and manslaughter in connection with Rappe's death, but was unanimously acquitted by a jury at the third trial. Though Arbuckle’s public reputation was salvaged, his career was hampered to a great extent by the scandal, and he himself would die relatively young (though, realistically, not especially young for a man of his size and habits), of a heart attack, aged 46. 

As for Virginia Rappe, unfortunately she was not a particularly prolific model and actress, only beginning in earnest when she moved to Los Angeles in 1917, then already 26 years old. Most of the films on her thin rΓ©sumΓ© are considered lost, leaving the question of what might have been very much unanswered. We simply do not know what kind of actress she was, or what she might have become. Regardless, she was a human being, and it is unfortunate that she is remembered chiefly for a scandal which, in the end, may not have been much of a scandal at all. 

After all, the jury in Arbuckle's third and final trial went so far as to issue him a formal apology.

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Friday, July 3, 2026

Remembering Susan Peters, 3 July 1921 to 23 October 1952

Colourised portrait of Susan Peters in the early 1940s. Dressed in a light blue short-sleeved blouse and a dark skirt, she stands beside a bicycle on a seaside promenade lined with palm trees. Leaning lightly against a stone railing, she gazes thoughtfully towards the bright horizon, her face illuminated by soft sunlight. Her dark hair is styled in loose curls and tied with a ribbon, while the bicycle rests between her and the walkway stretching into the distance. The composition conveys youthful elegance, optimism, and quiet contemplation. The sunlit setting, pastel colours, and relaxed pose create an atmosphere of carefree serenity, reflecting the wholesome screen image that helped make Peters one of Hollywood’s most promising young actresses of the early 1940s.
Steven Rea, c. 1943; colourised

Hollywood hath had its share of tragedy through the decades — lives cut short in various manners, from Carole Lombard to Marilyn Monroe to Sharon Tate, and many more in between and beyond. One of the very saddest tales is that of Susan Peters. One of the most promising young actresses of the early 1940s — first at Warner Bros. and later, more successfully, at MGM — she already had an Academy Award nomination under her belt (for 1942's Random Harvest) when a duck-hunting accident on New Year's Day 1945 left her permanently confined to a wheelchair. 

Amazingly, she made a courageous comeback as the wheelchair-bound villainess Leah St. Aubyn in 1948’s The Sign of the Ram (Columbia Pictures), a film that I am fairly certain I have seen at some point in the distant recesses of my memory, and may even have enjoyed, in spite of the fact it did not receive good reviews and was a box office flop. More critically successful was her turn as Laura Wingfield in a production of Tennessee WilliamsThe Glass Menagerie, and she also appeared as Elizabeth Barrett Browning in a production of The Barretts of Wimpole Street. In 1951, she starred in a live daily half-hour drama (not an uncommon practice in the early days of television) named Miss Susan for NBC, but this ended after about nine months as her health declined.

By 1952, abandoned by both her former husband and a fiancΓ©, and suffering profoundly from clinical depression and the effects of her paralysis, Susan Peters appeared to lose the will to live (apparently telling a doctor as much) and largely stopped eating and drinking. Compounded by the effects of her paralysis, she developed pneumonia and a chronic kidney infection, which ultimately killed her, only thirty-one years old. 

The universe is indifferent, and why such tragedy befalls innocent people and creatures I shall never understand. It certainly damages my faith in God whenever I hear a story such as this one, or witness needless cruelty and suffering in the world. Yet I do pray, and hope not in vain, that Susan Peters ultimately found the peace and happiness that so cruelly eluded her in life.

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Thursday, July 2, 2026

Remembering Lee Remick, 14 December 1935 to 2 July 1991

Publicity still of Lee Remick in Days of Wine and Roses (1962). Wearing a satin slip with lace trim, Remick stands indoors holding a drinking glass while resting one arm against her head. Her eyes are downcast and her expression conveys exhaustion, melancholy, and emotional strain. Strong light streams through slatted windows behind her, casting dramatic highlights and shadows across the black-and-white composition. The glass in her hand and her withdrawn posture underscore the film’s central themes of alcoholism, dependency, and personal decline. The intimate framing and stark lighting create a powerful portrait of vulnerability, reflecting the tragic emotional journey of her character, Kirsten Arnesen.
Warner Bros.

A lauded star of stage and screen, at some point the esteemed Lee Remick got frustrated with Hollywood, and was rather blunt about it:

“I make movies for grownups. When Hollywood starts making them again, I'll start acting in them again.” 

(source: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/lee_remick_211415)

Sadly, the world lost one of its great thespians on this day in 1991, another life cut short by cancer. Seen here in Days of Wine and Roses (1962); though amid the extraordinary heatwave afflicting the eastern half of the former United States, one could be forgiven for thinking this photograph was taken only moments ago. But I digress.

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Mary Pickford: dreams of Sunnybrook Farm

Publicity still of Mary Pickford in Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm (1917). Seated on a patterned Victorian sofa, Pickford portrays the youthful Rebecca in a frilled dress, dark stockings, and a small hat. Her long curled hair falls over her shoulders as she gazes forward with a plaintive, wide-eyed expression. She holds a closed parasol upright beside her while a travelling bag rests on the floor nearby, suggesting a recent arrival or impending journey. The black-and-white image emphasises the innocence and vulnerability associated with Pickford’s celebrated “little girl” screen persona. Ornate furnishings and period costume reinforce the film’s rural late-nineteenth-century setting and sentimental tone.

Canada Day: Toronto-born Mary Pickford, seen in Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm (1917, Aircraft Pictures). 

At the time of this photo still, she was the richest and most famous actress in the world, described by a contemporary writer as ‘the best known woman who has ever lived, the woman who was known to more people and loved by more people than any other woman that has been in all history’. 

Virtually forgotten today, partially due to having become a recluse later in life and partially due to the simple passage of time, which is sinful given that she was more than a mere actress, but a pioneer in the young film industry, co-founding United Artists in 1919 alongside (future husband) Douglas Fairbanks, Charlie Chaplin, and D.W. Griffith. All household names of the time themselves, though — best I can tell — only Charlie Chaplin might be recognised by a majority of folks today, and even then maybe only a majority of older people, as very few younger ones would know or care. 

I sometimes wonder whether that contributed, among many other factors, to Miss Pickford's depression in later life: knowing that even the most beloved public figures are eventually forgotten by the audiences that once adored them.

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Natalie Wood, a beautiful lady and talented actress in an absolutely wretched film: Penelope (1966, MGM)

A lobby card from the 1966 comedy Penelope, starring Natalie Wood and Ian Bannen. The image sheweth Penelope leaning across a bed toward her distracted husband, who seemeth more taken with paperwork and finances than with his wife. The caption maketh the point explicit: she attempteth to lure him from Wall Street reports. Quintessential mid-1960s studio comedy advertising—pastel pink and green dΓ©cor, playful poses, bright Technicolor, light romantic farce. The marketing selleth a battle ’twixt domestic boredom and corporate obsession. Wood’s comic appeal and glamour are front and centre; Bannen’s wary expression hinteth at the exasperated husband. A breezy, sophisticated sex comedy of the era—though many have found the film less delightful than its publicity.
MGM lobby card

Penelope: Not merely a bad film with an absurd plot, but one that actively insults the audience's intelligence. I swear I wrote an entire article some years ago about my hatred of this movie, but alas, I cannot find it now.

The plot, in a nutshell: a pampered housewife robs a bank because she is bored and her husband — the manager of the very bank she hath robbed, played by Scottish actor Ian Bannen, who was also far too talented for this dreck — does not pay her sufficient attention. In the end, everybody more or less lets her get away with it because she is just so darn cute, I suppose.

Natalie Wood as Penelope Elcott in Penelope (1966). Wearing a pink-and-white striped babydoll nightdress with matching slippers, she walketh confidently through an elegant interior, holding a cigarette. Her dark bouffant hair and makeup reflect mid-1960s fashion; the soft pastel costume contrasteth with grand stone walls and heavy wooden doors. The image exemplifieth the film’s playful, whimsical style—Penelope as a glamorous yet mischievous socialite whose innocence masketh her scheme to rob a bank. Warm lighting, vivid Technicolor hues, and Wood’s poised expression emphasise star quality and the light-hearted tone MGM sought to project.
MGM

The college flashback sequence featuring Jonathan Winters as a lecherous professor who refuses to keep his hands to himself is particularly galling, even by the standards of 1966. It is not amusing in the slightest, despite the filmmakers' obvious belief that it should be. It is merely obnoxious and unpleasant. Peter Falk appears as a detective (still a few years away from Columbo) and somehow manages to look embarrassed to be there, which, frankly, he should have been.

Still, with a reported wardrobe budget of $250,000, Penelope did at least provide Natalie Wood with an abundance of glamorous costumes and enough pin-up material to satisfy her admirers. The star herself reportedly disliked the film, saying: “I broke out in hives and suffered anguish that was very real pain every day we shot.”

Natalie Wood was just twenty-eight years old when Penelope was released in November 1966, yet it is difficult to escape the conclusion that much of her finest work was already behind her. When one surveys her filmography, her strongest performances are concentrated between the mid-1950s and the early 1960s. Whether Hollywood ceased offering her the best material, whether she selected some unfortunate projects, fate simply had other plans. 

A delightful publicity still from Penelope, featuring Natalie Wood at the height of her 1960s glamour. She is shewn seated on a bed in a frilled pastel nightdress, reading a small book entitled How to Rob a Bank. The joke is plain: an outwardly innocent, doll-like wife secretly contemplateth criminal enterprise. The oversized blue ribbon, elaborate eyeliner, and softly lit bedroom reinforce her image of youthful charm. The still communicateth the entire premise in one frame—laughter at the contrast ’twixt appearance and intention. Wood’s expressive eyes and natural presence lend undeniable appeal. The image promiseth a whimsical caper driven by personality and charm, precisely what the studio hoped audiences would see.
MGM

Natalie did not make another film until 1969 (another wretched sex farce whose only value is the star frolicking around in skimpy outfits), and was not very active at all in the 1970s. Had she not been tragically lost in 1981, perhaps there would have been a triumphant second act. I do believe that had she lived, and if she had chosen better roles and been in a better headspace, she was talented enough as an actress that she could have continued working into old age, as with Katharine Hepburn, Bette Davis, Meryl Streep, Helen Mirren, and so forth. Had she been really focused, she possessed sufficient talent that a distinguished late-career renaissance would hardly have been beyond the realm of possibility.

Whatever the answers as to what exactly went wrong with Natalie Wood’s career after the mid-1960s, or with the lady herself, Penelope remains one of the clearest examples of a gifted actress being let down by material utterly unworthy of her talents. 

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Monday, June 29, 2026

Lana Turner on what makes an individual a ‘success’, and yours truly on what does not

photo: Eric Carpenter, c. 1943

“A successful man is one who makes more money than a wife can spend. A successful woman is one who can find such a man.” — the screen goddess Lana Turner, 8 February 1921 to 29 June 1995.

Though delivered with a measure of worldly cynicism, there is a kernel of truth in the observation. Men are most often judged by what they can provide, and the loudest self-appointed gurus of modern masculinity (the ‘manosphere’) seem to understand only half of that equation. They obsess over testosterone, dominance, berating women, and projecting their twisted ideas of strength, whilst paying comparatively little attention to cultivating their minds, developing useful skills, or improving their financial prospects in life. Earning power is more important than virility — muscles and all of that are icing on the cake; if the cake is rich enough then it does not need any icing.

Yours truly hath made a million mistakes through the years. In my younger days, I spent far too much time worrying about the wrong things. Not because I was trying to become some sort of he-man figure — though I have the voice of a much more imposing man, my pale and skinny arse was still never destined for that role; mind you, this was also long before the current moral panic over the loss of masculinity and the ugliness it hath inspired — but because I was forever trying to fit in with groups and individuals whose approval I believed I needed. Even in my late thirties when I was involved in the twelve-step cult, I was all too often a ‘people pleaser’. It was ingrained in me by numerous parties, during my formative years, that simply being myself was never going to suffice. None of those people are anywhere to be found today, when I am too exhausted and fed-up to be anything but myself.

Looking back, I can see how much time and energy I wasted pursuing acceptance from people who neither deserved it nor appreciated it. I cared too much about belonging and not nearly enough about building a life for myself. Had I chosen different priorities, surrounded myself with different people, and possessed a little more confidence in my own judgement, many things would have turned out differently. Perhaps I would be able to leave this dying country if I had, somehow, made more money in my prime years. Instead, I shall die here, with all the other fools.

On the other hand, even if I had become a rich man, I do not know that there are any Lana Turners to be had in this world now.

But I digress.

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Remembering the silver-screen goddess Katharine Hepburn, 12 May 1907 to 29 June 2003

A black-and-white studio portrait of Katharine Hepburn reclining in a relaxed pose, photographed with understated elegance. She resteth against soft furnishings, one arm bent behind her head, gazing at the camera with calm, thoughtful expression. Her wavy hair is styled in natural mid-century fashion, framing a face lit by dramatic high-contrast lighting. She weareth a textured light garment with broad sleeves, the fabric catching light and creating subtle tonal variation. Deep shadows and bright highlights lend a cinematic quality, drawing attention to her eyes and features. The background remaineth softly out of focus. Poise, intelligence, self-assurance, quiet glamour—the independent screen persona of Hollywood’s Golden Age.
Ernest Bachrach/John Kobal Foundation/Getty Images

The question of who was the most talented actress of Hollywood's Golden Age is, of course, an entirely subjective one. Art does not lend itself particularly well to league tables, scorecards, or definitive rankings. Objectively, however, Katharine Hepburn is at or near the top of just about anybody's list. Indeed, in 1999, the American Film Institute named her the greatest female screen legend in American cinema.

Independent, fiercely intelligent, headstrong, and utterly unwilling to conform to expectations, she was a pioneer in more ways than one. Four Academy Awards for Best Actress attests to this. In an industry built upon image, compromise, and conformity, she stubbornly insisted upon being Katharine Hepburn. I harbour a deep respect for people who live life on their own terms and refuse to allow society to dictate who they must be. Such individuals make the rest of you uncomfortable. They challenge conventions. They are difficult, argumentative, impatient, and occasionally maddening (takes one to know one, folks). Katharine Hepburn was all of those things at various times, and so too was the great love of her life, Mr Spencer Tracy. Neither would have won many prizes for meek obedience.

History is not shaped by the obedient. Without individuals of strong character, personality, and will, no progress would ever be made in this world, and civilisation would stagnate altogether (to some extent, I see this happening in real time). At the very least, it would be a duller and less interesting world. We ought to give eternal thanks that people such as Katharine Hepburn — and Spencer Tracy, Sidney Poitier, Bette Davis, Joan Crawford, Greta Garbo, James Cagney, James Stewart, Norma Shearer, and I could go on and on — once graced this unworthy world with their presence. 

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Friday, June 26, 2026

Ann Blyth, 16 August 1927 to 24 June 2026

A black-and-white publicity still of actress Ann Blyth seated in a bubble-filled bath, smiling as she admir’th her reflection in a hand mirror while brushing her hair. Thick foam conceals her, leaving shoulders, arms, and upper chest visible. Her hair is styled in soft waves with period bangs; her expression speaketh warmth, charm, and playful assurance. The tiled set holdeth shelves with bottles; a mermaid mural appear’th on the wall—reinforcing the fantasy of Mr. Peabody and the Mermaid (1948). Soft studio lighting highlights her features and the shimmering bubbles—a light-hearted, glamorous image of late-1940s Hollywood.
Universal publicity shot, 1948

Ann Blyth, teen star of ‘Mildred Pierce,’ dead at 98. {AP 26 June}

https://apnews.com/article/ann-blyth-dead-98-mildred-pierce-56ff27b6e5a8446bb239be6ce4a66311

Fare thee well, Ann Blyth: the Oscar-nominated actress, singer, and star of the 1940s and 50s hath died, aged 98. Forever remembered for her portrayal of the manipulative Veda Pierce in 1945's Mildred Pierce, yet equally capable of charm and warmth in a host of lighter musical roles. Such as in 1948’s Mr. Peabody and the Mermaid (pictured above), in which she appeared opposite William Powell. One of the last living links to Hollywood's Golden Age departs the stage, and the world grows a little stranger — and a little colder — with each passing day.

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Wednesday, June 24, 2026

The timeless elegance of MΓ€rta TorΓ©n

A black-and-white studio portrait of Swedish actress MΓ€rta TorΓ©n gazing directly into the camera with poised, quiet confidence. Reclining forward on a cushioned surface, she resteth her folded arms beneath her chin—intimate, relaxed. Her dark hair is styled in sculpted shoulder-length waves with a deep side part, framing her fine features and striking eyes. She weareth a simple long-sleeved knitted top, keeping focus upon her face. Soft, controlled studio lighting accentuates smooth contours while casting gentle shadows for depth and refinement. Uncluttered background and close framing lend timeless elegance—classic 1940s Hollywood publicity photography.
source unknown

Swedish goddess MΓ€rta TorΓ©n, 21 May 1926 to 19 February 1957. An accomplished stage and film actress of the 1940s and 1950s known for her elegance, understated naturalism, and a manner that stood apart from the more theatrical acting styles of the period. She achieved international recognition, including appearing opposite Humphrey Bogart in the 1951 film noir Sirocco. Tragically taken from this world at the tender age of 31 following a subarachnoid haemorrhage, only two days after her final stage performance. The sudden loss of such a gifted actress deprived both Swedish and international audiences of a career that undoubtedly would have continued to flourish for many years to come.

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Sunday, June 21, 2026

Juliette Lewis: the unruly muse

Actress Juliette Lewis reclines across an ornate Victorian-style chaise longue upholstered in pale patterned fabric. Dressed in a flowing cream-coloured slip and black lace stockings, she stretches languidly along the length of the sofa, one leg raised over the curved backrest while the other extends towards the floor. Her dark hair spills over the edge of the furniture, and she gazes directly towards the camera with a confident, playful expression. The room is sparsely furnished, with neutral walls and soft indoor lighting that emphasises the contrast between the antique white upholstery and the dark carved wood frame of the chaise. The composition combines glamour photography with a relaxed, theatrical pose, creating an atmosphere of vintage Hollywood sensuality and understated elegance.
source unknown

“If someone tells you over and over that everything's great, you immediately think, 'OK, what's the rest of the story?'” — the free-spirited and independent-minded Juliette Lewis, born 21 June 1973. 

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Friday, June 12, 2026

Remembering the radiant Priscilla Lane

A colourised publicity-style portrait of actress Priscilla Lane standing outdoors beside a rustic stone wall. She weareth a sleeveless patterned summer dress in muted rose and cream, with dark-heeled sandals, holding a light hat at her side. One foot resteth upon a low stone step, lending her pose a relaxed yet self-assured elegance. Her softly curled blonde hair is styled in late-1930s fashion; she gazeth off-camera with a pleasant, thoughtful expression. Trees, shrubs, and distant buildings appear beyond the wall beneath an overcast sky. Wholesome girl-next-door charm meeteth Hollywood polish. The colourisation warmeth flesh tones, stonework, and the dress’s subdued palette.
source unknown; colourised via ChatGPT

Iowa-born Priscilla Lane (12 June 1915 to 4 April 1995) earned a reputation in Hollywood as a warm and affable figure and was the youngest of the four Lane (nΓ©e Mullican) sisters, each of whom found success before the cameras (Leota, Lola, and Rosemary being the others). Yet it was Priscilla whose fame proved the most enduring.

Priscilla enjoyed her greatest screen success during her years at Warner Brothers, where she was arguably best remembered for starring opposite two heavyweights, James Cagney and Humphrey Bogart, in the 1939 gangster epic The Roaring Twenties. She compiled a formidable rΓ©sumΓ© by sharing the screen with, among others, Cary Grant, Ronald Reagan, Wayne Morris, Jane Wyman, George Brent, and Jack Benny.

After departing Warner Brothers for a brief stint at Universal Pictures, she appeared in Alfred Hitchcock’s 1942 thriller Saboteur, reportedly over the director’s objections, as he felt she was too much of a ‘girl next door’ type for the role.

Following the Second World War, she largely retired from the film industry and eventually settled with her New England-born husband, former US Army Air Corpsman Joseph Howard, in Andover, Massachusetts. For a spell in the late 1950s, she hosted a daytime television talk show on WBZ-TV (Channel 4) in Boston.

She was laid to rest beside her husband at Arlington National Cemetery, her life a testament to the fact that not every Hollywood story requires a tragic ending.


πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Pining for better days with Elizabeth Hurley. Sixty-one years old today, if anyone can believe it

A black-and-white photograph of Elizabeth Hurley, as a young dark-haired woman, standing in a marble-tiled bathroom. She is topless, wearing lace briefs, both hands raised to her hair. She gazeth directly at the camera. A floral curtain and white towels are visible behind.
Getty Images

One of modern England's most astonishingly beautiful women, actress and model Elizabeth Hurley is possessed of striking features, effortless glamour, and the peculiarly English combination of elegance and mischievous self-awareness.

Born on 10 June 1965 in Basingstoke, she emerged during an era when Britain was unusually proficient at producing women of remarkable beauty and exporting them to the wider world. She has also possessed uncommon staying power, navigating modelling, film, television, fashion, and celebrity culture with an ease suggesting that she understands the machinery of fame better than most of those operating it.

North of sixty, she is still very much in striking form, carrying herself with the confidence and poise of someone entirely comfortable in her own skin and wholly uninterested in apologising for it. I must confess that I do not know what to make of reports that she is dating Billy Ray Cyrus, of all the bloody people in this world, except that beautiful women have been making baffling romantic decisions since the dawn of civilisation. Hugh Grant may attest to that, though obviously it is not at all baffling why almost any woman would, at least at first sight, be swept off her feet by a devastatingly handsome British gentleman. Billy Ray, a redneck American whose only claims to fame are a hit song from thirty-five years ago and fathering an obnoxious daughter who nonetheless scored more hits than he ever did, is a lot harder to figure out. But I digress.

No matter. Elizabeth Hurley remains a vibrant and shining presence in this undeserving world, and Mr ‘Achy Breaky Heart’ had better not break hers.

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Saturday, June 6, 2026

The girl who would not stand still: the devastating Yvonne Craig is a whirl of pink, sometime in the 1960s.

A colour publicity photograph of Yvonne Craig performing an energetic dance pose upon a paved terrace in a landscaped garden. She weareth a vibrant pink satin dress with floral detailing and ruffles; the skirt billoweth as she lifteth one side, conveying movement and theatrical flair. Her dark hair is styled in neat mid-century fashion; she smileth toward the camera with confident playfulness. Low-heeled shoes complete the costume. Behind her, mature trees and lawns provide a tranquil setting. Warm sunlight enhanceth the rich pink tones and casteth soft shadows. The mood is cheerful, glamorous, and distinctly 1960s Hollywood—celebrating Craig’s youthful vitality, elegance, and show-business charm.
source unknown

One of the more irritating habits of posterity is its tendency to reduce perfectly accomplished people to a single role, a single costume, or a single photograph. The future appears especially guilty of this offence. Mention Yvonne Craig and most Americans today remember only Batgirl (and, at this point, they must be of a certain age to remember her at all, though it is an ageing country). Long before she ever swung a leg over the Batcycle or exchanged quips with television villains in Gotham City, however, Yvonne Craig had already established herself as one of the most striking and recognisable models and pin-up favourites in the US, as well as a dancer of genuine accomplishment and a steadily rising television personality.

Undeniably beautiful, certainly, but also projecting intelligence, vitality, and a faintly mischievous confidence that made audiences take notice, there was a real spark about this foxy lady, Yvonne Craig: an impression that she was fully aware of the absurdity of show business and was enjoying the spectacle nonetheless. As an actress, she moved effortlessly between dramatic and comedic material and demonstrated a perhaps surprising versatility. Westerns, adventures, light comedies, dramas: she did it all.

Her background as a trained dancer meant Craig possessed remarkable poise, athleticism, and bodily control. In practical terms, this meant she could perform demanding physical sequences while retaining an elegance that many performers would have sacrificed the moment things became strenuous; making her perfect, of course, for the role of television’s ultimate camp superheroine — and for so much more. All the hail the television goddess, Yvonne Craig.

linktr.ee/arthurnewhook

πŸͺπŸ’” #QueSeraSera π“…¨ πŸ•ˆ

Copyright 2026, Arthur Newhook.

Sunday, December 28, 2025

Brigitte Bardot, 1934 – 2025.

A colour film still shows Brigitte Bardot framed tightly against a dark, indistinct background, the lighting isolating her face and upper torso with dramatic intensity. Her long, pale blonde hair falls loosely over her shoulders, slightly disordered, reinforcing a sense of emotional strain rather than glamour. She presses a folded handkerchief to one eye, her gaze fixed forward with a guarded, wounded expression that suggests pain, exhaustion, or private reckoning. The dark neckline of her dress recedes into shadow, drawing attention to the tension in her features and the stark contrast between illuminated skin and surrounding darkness. The composition is intimate and confrontational, presenting vulnerability without sentimentality and capturing a moment of inward collapse held rigidly in check.


The ultimate French screen goddess hath departed this unworthy realm. Thank you, chΓ¨re dame, for a life and body of work that ennobled it. Dazzling, divisive, indelible: she taught the camera to breathe, and then elected silence. Brigitte Bardot, 1934–2025.

Copyright 2025, Arthur Newhook.

Sunday, December 7, 2025

Light, shadow, and a woman who knew exactly how to command both: Joan Bennett

A colour-tinted publicity photograph from around 1942 captures Joan Bennett posed against a woven rattan backdrop, her expression serene yet faintly enigmatic. She wears a white, eyelet-embroidered crop blouse that frames her shoulders and midriff with summery lightness, contrasted by a boldly patterned skirt in ochre, red, and black, its abstract motifs evoking a wartime fascination with the exotic.  Her dark, softly waved hair is arranged with meticulous studio polish, and her make-up—crimson lips, defined brows, and subtly shadowed eyes—exemplifies the glamour grammar of early-forties Hollywood. One arm is raised behind her head, the gesture accentuating her poise while displaying a cluster of bracelets that glint against the textured background. The overall composition blends languid sensuality with stylised elegance, presenting Bennett as both starlet and icon of her era’s cultivated allure.
Columbia Pictures, 1942

#OTD 1990: Joan Bennett, the distinguished and profoundly adaptable actress, took her final bow at the age of eighty. Born into one of America’s grand theatrical dynasties—her grandmother, parents, and illustrious sisters Constance and Barbara all creatures of the stage and screen—Bennett was seemingly fated for performance. Yet she transcended inheritance, transforming what might have been mere legacy into art fashioned boldly of her own hand.

Over a career that spanned more than sixty years, she became a very mistress of metamorphosis. First the golden ingΓ©nue of the early talkies, then—under the darkling, chiaroscuro eye of Fritz Lang—the smouldering brunette heroine of Scarlet Street and The Woman in the Window, before emerging, in her later years, as a commanding matriarch of theatre, cinema, and television alike.

Few actresses navigated Hollywood’s shifting eras with such poise or intelligence. Joan Bennett remains not merely the descendant of a storied lineage, but its apotheosis: a woman who reinvented herself across the decades with elegance, courage, and a rare, enduring luminosity.

Copyright 2025, Arthur Newhook.

Thursday, December 4, 2025

Stretched out as a figure from a Renaissance sketch, a mood of memory rather than shock: Sharon Stone in Playboy, July 1990

A sepia-toned photograph from Playboy (July 1990) captures Sharon Stone in a languid, sculptural pose upon rumpled bedclothes, the composition suffused with the grain and warmth of late-20th-century glamour photography. Her body lies diagonally across the frame, one arm flung above her head, the other disappearing beyond the margin, creating an elegant sweep of line and shadow. Her face is turned away, half-submerged in pillow and hair, lending the image an atmosphere of reverie rather than display.  She wears only a pair of delicate lace knickers, the fine embroidery catching the light in soft, intricate highlights. The interplay of fabric, skin, and bedding produces a tableau that is at once intimate and stylised, evoking the era’s penchant for transforming the private moment into a heightened, almost cinematic still life.

Sharon Stone, in Playboy, July 1990—doth bear the languid grace of a figure rescued from a Florentine sketchbook, more muse than siren. The pose recalls not the vaunting gestures of provocation but the serenity of Renaissance study, wherein form setteth itself in measured balance against the shadow, and the body is made a kind of meditation.

Her expression—neither wantonly coy nor stiffly defiant—appears to be caught betwixt thought and dreaming, belonging less unto the realm of the sensual than unto that of memory and inward musing. An archetype of governed fragility: present and yet unknowable, mortal and yet refined to an ideal. A beauty that crieth not aloud, but breatheth gently, like a whispered truth.

Truly, Sharon Stone was among the fairest and most admired women upon the earth at the hour of this shoot, and rose thereafter to become one of Hollywood’s highest-grossing and most gifted actresses in the prime of her days. Of what present course she steereth now I know not, yet I doubt not she remains a bold and dauntless spirit still.

Copyright 2025, Arthur Newhook.

Sunday, November 30, 2025

Sun, stones, and smiles at the English seaside: Jean Kent, 29 June 1921 to 30 November 2013

Jean Kent reclines upon a sun-struck shingle beach, her figure arranged with an effortless, almost theatrical languor that speaks to both the artifice and spontaneity of mid-century glamour photography. She wears a pale, ivory two-piece swimsuit—high-waisted, softly ruched, embroidered with delicate motifs—that accentuates the natural elegance of her posture. One arm arcs behind her head, resting upon a brightly striped beach ball that serves as a makeshift cushion; the other lies relaxed at her side, fingers brushing the warm stones. Her expression is radiant, a smile imbued with that characteristic Gainsborough charm: poised yet unguarded, luminous without ostentation. Sunlight catches the sheen of her skin and the dark gloss of her hair, while the surrounding pebbles form a textured, tawny mosaic, rendering her presence all the more vivid—an embodiment of British seaside glamour in its most serene and quintessentially post-war guise.

Jean Kent—who departed this mortal stage upon this day in 2013, aged ninety—was one of the most English of stars: one whose brightness seldom voyaged far abroad, yet whose craft was subtly interwoven with the very substance of British cinema. Born in London and ascending through the ranks of Gainsborough Pictures during the fragile post-war years, she came to embody the distinctly British concord of grace, gentle wit, and quiet, discerning feeling.

From the mid-1940s through the following decade, her name did shine upon the marquees of an industry labouring to recover its confidence after the lean austerity of war. To domestic audiences she stood as a pledge of continuance—glamour without prodigality, sophistication without vanity—and she played the screen heroine with a natural restraint now almost lost to the art.

Abroad she was never a household name, yet at home she represented something vital: the assurance that British cinema might stand firm upon its own aesthetic footing, cultivating composure where Hollywood paraded its marvels. An age when understatement bore the lustre of magnificence, and Jean Kent was its most radiant exemplar.

Copyright 2025, Arthur Newhook.

Saturday, November 29, 2025

Remembering Natalie Wood, 20 July 1938 to 29 November 1981


“I didn't like children. I didn't think of myself as a child. I didn't like any of the things other children were interested in.”Natalie Wood, gone from the world on this day in 1981, at only forty-three. She appears here in a radiant promotional still for The Great Race (1965, Warner Bros.), a vision of mid-century glamour caught at its zenith. In this photograph she seems to distil the essence of her screen presence: that miraculous fusion of sparkle and stillness, vivacity tempered by something inward and ineffably sad.

Few stars ever carried such light within such fragility. Her smile illuminates the frame, yet behind it flickers the shadow of introspection, the faint ache that made her beauty so indelible. Not all of her films were winners (see Penelope, as wretched a film as I've ever seen), but in all she was both muse and mystery—a woman whose brightness could fill a cinema, and whose silence could linger long after the film had ended.

Copyright 2025, Arthur Newhook.

The enduring grace of Diane Keen

photo: source unknown; colourised via ChatGPT Renowned English actress Diane Keen , celebrating her 79th birthday today (born 29 July 1947 i...